IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v11y2017i2p105-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Considerations Regarding The Religious Rights Of The Patients. Medical And Legal Aspects

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Aluas
  • Maria Lucia Hategan

Abstract

If we were to describe our contemporary world by means of one single word that would, most certainly, be multiculturalism. All across the planet, cultures and religions unceasingly interact and more often than not clash and collide leading to covert as well as overt tensions and conflicts and their most extreme manifestations, terrorism and war. There are some places though, all over the world, where willingly or not these differences are brought together by common suffering: medical settings, especially hospitals, still governed by non-discriminating moral principles and professional guidelines. This may be a good point to start reconciliation, but will this be enough? Satisfying all these different requirements has ample legal support in national, European and international provisions. However, each individual is defined by a distinctive personality and a unique set of values and also by his own complex combination of medical problems. Close cooperation between physicians, religious representatives and organizations and social services, supported by the corresponding commissions defines an intricated yet much needed approach to the patient while furthermore struggling with inevitable time and financial limitations.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Aluas & Maria Lucia Hategan, 2017. "Considerations Regarding The Religious Rights Of The Patients. Medical And Legal Aspects," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 11(2), pages 105-113, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:11:y:2017:i:2:p:105-113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/327-Article-Text-634-1-10-20180226.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Patient’s Rights; Autonomy; Refusing treatments; Religious Rights;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K38 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Human Rights Law; Gender Law; Animal Rights Law
    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:11:y:2017:i:2:p:105-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.