IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v11y2017i1p302-312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gauging Of The Effectiveness Of Legal Rules

Author

Listed:
  • Antal Visegrády
  • Eszter Vörös

Abstract

The paper presents the measuring of the effectiveness of legal rules. There has been and is being taken steps so far in three dimensions: on the ground of law-making, in the sphere of application of law, and with respect to legal consciousness. The first part of our study shows the gauging of the effectiveness of law-making in some fields, from the experiment related Donald Campbell and Laurence Ross to Carbonnier’s opinion about measuring the effectiveness of criminal law. The second part of the paper demonstrates the gauging of the effectiveness of judicial application of law. Last but not least, the third part of the study is the gauging of the effectiveness of legal consciousness and in connection with it, we are submitting the so-called Chicago examination and Barna Horváth’s survey on people’s acceptance of the newly introduced legal rules.

Suggested Citation

  • Antal Visegrády & Eszter Vörös, 2017. "Gauging Of The Effectiveness Of Legal Rules," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 302-312, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:302-312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/316-Article-Text-612-1-10-20170609.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    gauging; effectiveness; law-making; judicial application of law; legal consciousness Pages: 302-312;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:302-312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.