IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v11y2017i1p206-219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Few Relevant Aspects From The Constitutional Court’S Jurisprudence Regarding The Protection Of Children

Author

Listed:
  • Mircea Stefan Minea
  • Anca Mihaela Georoceanu

Abstract

Romania's Constitutional Court – in its already long judicial activity, has held on numerous occasions with respect to certain legal texts devoted to child protection. In the present study we only selected a few relevant decisions, the brief summaries of which being intended to illustrate the concern of the constitutional court towards ensuring the undivided respect of the child’s superior interest. Given the succession of the laws applicable to the field of child protection, a series of issues have been raised in judicial practice, some decided upon by the courts, others by the Constitutional Court. As described in the title, we will refer only to the Constitutional Court’s jurisprudence.

Suggested Citation

  • Mircea Stefan Minea & Anca Mihaela Georoceanu, 2017. "A Few Relevant Aspects From The Constitutional Court’S Jurisprudence Regarding The Protection Of Children," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 206-219, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:206-219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/307-Article-Text-594-1-10-20170608.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elena-Mihaela Fodor, 2017. "Protection Of The Superior Interest Of The Child Under The European Convention Of Human Rights. Cases Against Romania," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 11(2), pages 85-95, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Romania's Constitutional Court; Superior Interest of Child; European Court of Human Rights’ judicial practice;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)
    • K38 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Human Rights Law; Gender Law; Animal Rights Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:206-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.