IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v11y2017i1p134-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Appeal Against The Titles Of The Tax Claim. Inadmissible Actions Formulated Directly In Court

Author

Listed:
  • Eugenia Iovanas

Abstract

According to the provisions of the Article 7, paragraph 5, the second thesis of Law number 554/2004, for this category of action, prior complaint is not mandatory, and according to the provisions of the Article 11, paragraph 4, the first thesis, direct action addressed to the Court can be registered anytime. Provided that the competent tax authority has not solved substantive tax appeal regarding the payment amount representing the tax liability, is not justified, legally speaking, the annulment of the decision of taxation issued and the exemption of tax claim on the grounds that the applicant does not owe it, as a result of truthlessness manifested by the tax authority. By proceeding in this respect, the trial Court has replaced the competent tax authority, which has not analyzed the tax appeal regarding the amount of money for tax payment obligations and which has the jurisdiction to deal with the resolution of the complaint formulated against the titles of the tax claim.

Suggested Citation

  • Eugenia Iovanas, 2017. "Appeal Against The Titles Of The Tax Claim. Inadmissible Actions Formulated Directly In Court," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 134-140, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:134-140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/300-Article-Text-580-1-10-20170608.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elena-Mihaela Fodor, 2015. "The Preliminary Complaint In The Fiscal Procedure," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 57-66, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      tax claim; tax appeal; prior complaint; decision of taxation; tax authority;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:134-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.