IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v10y2016i2p42-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Une Greffe Institutionnelle Reusite: L’Ombudsman Roumain

Author

Listed:
  • Mircea Criste

Abstract

After a painful experience, that lasted more than 50 years under the communist regime, Romania rejoined, in December 1989, the family of democratic countries to which it used to belong before World War II. However, in the late 20th century, democracy is no longer the same as the one dating back to the first half of the last century: it is nowadays focused on the effective promotion and safeguard of human rights against possible abusive actions originating from the legislature or the executive. Hence, the reintroduction and reception of certain constitutional institutions or mechanisms have been achieved in Romania under the sign of this new reality from the end of the second millennium, overlapped with the communist experience, when no proper protection of the fundamental rights existed. An effective promotion and safeguard of human rights against abusive actions originating from the legislature or the executive can be achieved also through the implementation of the Ombudsman institution, a pillar which are essential in asserting the rule of law, and which have experienced a remarkable evolution since the fall of communism. The Romanian Ombudsman is not a jurisdictional institution, but an autonomous public authority, independent of any other public authority, which actions are based on conciliation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mircea Criste, 2016. "Une Greffe Institutionnelle Reusite: L’Ombudsman Roumain," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 10(2), pages 42-55, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:10:y:2016:i:2:p:42-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/ojs/index.php/fi/article/view/259/242
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ombudsman; human rights protection; rule of law; separation of powers;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior
    • K39 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:10:y:2016:i:2:p:42-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.