IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v10y2016i2p183-193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theoretical And Practical Aspects Concerning The Limitation On Foreclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Vlad Dan Oanea

Abstract

The prescription concerning the right to action is one of the most important penalties provided for by civil legislation, but at the same time one of the exceptions that may be raised by a debtor by way of an appeal on enforcement’s prescription because even if observed by the court which authorizes the enforcement, this thing will not invoke enforcement’s prescription of because under the new provisions of the code of civil procedure, it is not an exception concerning public order.

Suggested Citation

  • Vlad Dan Oanea, 2016. "Theoretical And Practical Aspects Concerning The Limitation On Foreclosure," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 10(2), pages 183-193, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:10:y:2016:i:2:p:183-193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/272-Article-Text-526-1-10-20170112.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Enforcement; appeal against enforcement; limitation; civil action; means of defence;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process
    • K49 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:10:y:2016:i:2:p:183-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.