IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v10y2016i1p21-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Historical Considerations Of Invention Patenting

Author

Listed:
  • Izabela Bratiloveanu

Abstract

This study aims at observing the dynamics of the process of invention protection in Romania. It consists of a chronological analysis of the main pieces of legislation, beginning with Law no.102/1906, which filled a legislative void and proved extremely important for the social, economic and industrial development of the country. The first Romanian law for the granting of invention patents was inspired by the French and Belgian legislation. Rescinded, amended and completed by subsequent regulations, this piece of legislation was applied until the 30th of December 1967, when it was rescinded by Decree no. 884/1967, the provisions of which are detailed below. The paper also includes a synthesis of the amendments made to Law no. 62/1974. The profound changes which occurred in the Romanian society after 1989 made it necessary to adopt new regulations regarding the protection of technical creations, in order both to stimulate creative activities and to correct the unjust decisions taken on account of the previous legislation.

Suggested Citation

  • Izabela Bratiloveanu, 2016. "Historical Considerations Of Invention Patenting," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 10(1), pages 21-35, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:10:y:2016:i:1:p:21-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/233-Article-Text-450-1-10-20160525.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    : patent; inventor; invention; innovation; rationalization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K11 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Property Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:10:y:2016:i:1:p:21-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.