IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dat/dialog/y2019i4p1-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rejoinder To Wysocki On Indifference And The Block-Hoppe Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Walter Block

    (Loyola University New Orleans)

Abstract

There has been an ongoing debate in Austrian economic circles on indifference and methodology. It started with Nozick (1977) who criticized this school of thought on that issue. Block (1980) responded to that essay. The main debaters within Austrian circles have been Block (2009A), Block and Barnett (2010), and Hoppe (2005, 2009). Wysocki (2017) is a recent entry into this discussion. The present paper is a response to this latter contribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Walter Block, 2019. "Rejoinder To Wysocki On Indifference And The Block-Hoppe Debate," Electronic magazine "Dialogue", D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 4 Year 20, pages 1-7.
    • Handle: RePEc:dat:dialog:y:2019:i:4:p:1-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10610/4249
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José Antonio Manuel Aguirre Sotelo & Walter E. Block, 2014. "Indifference Curve Analysis: The Correct And The Incorrect," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 5(4), pages 7-43, December.
    2. Bryan Caplan, 1999. "The Austrian Search for Realistic Foundations," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(4), pages 823-838, April.
    3. Walter E. Block & José Antonio Manuel Aguirre Sotelo, 2012. "Indifference Curve Analysis: Beyond Simplifying Assumptions," Journal for Economic Educators, Middle Tennessee State University, Business and Economic Research Center, vol. 12(1), pages 7-12, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David J. Hebert, 2017. "Pascal Salin, competition, coordination and diversity: From the firm to economic integration," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 30(1), pages 143-146, March.
    2. Marian Eabrasu, 2008. "An Assessment of Subjectivism. Its Meaning and its Limits," ICER Working Papers 01-2008, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    3. Joshua R. Hendrickson, 2017. "Interest rates and investment coordination failures," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 30(4), pages 493-515, December.
    4. Chandler, Gaylen N. & DeTienne, Dawn R. & McKelvie, Alexander & Mumford, Troy V., 2011. "Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 375-390, May.
    5. Auke R. Leen, 2001. "Buyer and Seller Beware!," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 16(Spring 20), pages 75-90.
    6. Henk Folmer & Wim Heijman & Auke Leen, 2002. "Product Liability: A Neo-Austrian Based Perspective," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 73-84, January.
    7. Daniel D’Amico, 2010. "Jesus Huerta de Soto, Book review of The Austrian school: Market order and entrepreneurial creativity," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 23(2), pages 193-198, June.
    8. Trevor Jones & Monder Ram, 2013. "Entrepreneurship as ethnic minority liberation," Research Papers 0011, Enterprise Research Centre.
    9. Vlad Tarko, 2013. "Can probability theory deal with entrepreneurship?," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 26(3), pages 329-345, September.
    10. Randall Holcombe, 2009. "The behavioral foundations of Austrian economics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 22(4), pages 301-313, December.
    11. Randall Holcombe, 2009. "A reformulation of the foundations of welfare economics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 22(3), pages 209-224, September.
    12. Santiago J. Gangotena, 2017. "Dynamic coordinating non-equilibrium," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 30(1), pages 51-82, March.
    13. Senderski, Marcin, 2014. "Ecumenical foundations? On the coexistence of Austrian and neoclassical views on utility," MPRA Paper 67024, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Jeffrey Rogers Hummel, 2008. "Toward a Libertarian Reconstruction of Neoclassical Welfare Theory," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 24(Fall 2008), pages 119-130.
    15. Gry Agnete Alsos & Sara Carter & Elisabet Ljunggren, 2013. "Entrepreneurial families and households," Research Papers 0010, Enterprise Research Centre.
    16. Walter Block & Per Henrik Hansen & Peter G. Klein, 2008. "The Division of Labor Under Homogeneity: A Critique of Mises and Rothbard," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Labor Economics From A Free Market Perspective Employing the Unemployable, chapter 25, pages 337-344, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    17. Leonid Krasnozhon & John Levendis, 2015. "Mises and prediction markets: Can markets forecast?," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 28(1), pages 41-52, March.
    18. Randall G. Holcombe, 2017. "Malinvestment," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 30(2), pages 153-167, June.
    19. José Antonio Manuel Aguirre Sotelo & Walter E. Block, 2014. "Indifference Curve Analysis: The Correct And The Incorrect," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 5(4), pages 7-43, December.
    20. Hild Marte Bjornsen & Olaf Foss & Steinar Johansen & Bjorg Langset, 2013. "Services Of General Interest In Europe: Political Context And Territorial Evidence. An Introduction," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 7(3), pages 9-36, JUNE.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    indifference; methodology; Austrian economics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B00 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - General - - - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dat:dialog:y:2019:i:4:p:1-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kostadin Bashev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tsenobg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.