IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/das/njaigs/v6y2024i1p503-508id276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis Of Machine Learning Algorithms For Image Classification

Author

Listed:
  • Shanika Kithulgodage

Abstract

This research aims to use a subset of the CIFAR100 dataset to develop and present an empirical examination of the performance of powerful Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) for object detection. Image datasets, CIFAR10, CIFAR 100, and MINIST image datasets are all common benchmark datasets for testing performance. This research examines the well-known dataset CIFAR 100. Both classifiers' important attributes are combined in the constructed models. The suggested model's algorithm is trained and tested using images from the CIFAR-100 dataset. The CIFAR 100 is made up of 100 different classes, each with 600 photos. CNN and SVM's receptive fields aid in automatically extracting the most identifiable features from these images. The experimental results confirm the effectiveness of the implementation by reaching a maximum recognition accuracy of 0.4919 percent. Results were obtained as maximum accuracy of 0.4817% For the CNN on Coarse Super Label and maximum accuracy of 0.3696% For the CNN on Fine Super Label, while SVM on Coarse Super Label resulted in an accuracy of 0.0795% and SVM on Fine super Label resulted in 0.0285%. According to the results, CNN was able to exceed the benchmark of 39.43% and 24.49%, but SVM was unable to do so.

Suggested Citation

  • Shanika Kithulgodage, 2024. "Analysis Of Machine Learning Algorithms For Image Classification," Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023, Open Knowledge, vol. 6(1), pages 503-508.
  • Handle: RePEc:das:njaigs:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:503-508:id:276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://newjaigs.com/index.php/JAIGS/article/view/276
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:das:njaigs:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:503-508:id:276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Open Knowledge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://newjaigs.com/index.php/JAIGS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.