IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/wotrrv/v6y2007i02p233-248_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The EC–Biotech dispute and applicability of the SPS Agreement: are the panel's findings built on shaky ground?

Author

Listed:
  • CONRAD, CHRISTIANE R.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Conrad, Christiane R., 2007. "The EC–Biotech dispute and applicability of the SPS Agreement: are the panel's findings built on shaky ground?," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 233-248, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:wotrrv:v:6:y:2007:i:02:p:233-248_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474745607003254/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne-Célia Disdier & Lionel Fontagné, 2010. "Trade impact of European measures on GMOs condemned by the WTO panel," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 146(3), pages 495-514, September.
    2. Brankov, Tatjana Papić & Lovre, Koviljko, 2013. "WTO Law and Genetically Modified Products," 135th Seminar, August 28-30, 2013, Belgrade, Serbia 160376, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:wotrrv:v:6:y:2007:i:02:p:233-248_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/wtr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.