IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/wotrrv/v18y2019i03p531-532_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China – Domestic Support for Agricultural Producers (China–Agricultural Producers), DS511

Author

Listed:
  • Sohlberg, Marcus
  • Yvon, Ariane

Abstract

The dispute concerns certain market price support measures by China to domestic agricultural producers of wheat, Indica rice, Japonica rice, and corn, which the United States (US) claimed were inconsistent with China's obligations under the WTO Agreement on Agriculture. Specifically, the US considered that China utilized market price measures in the period 2012–2015 to support farmer incomes and increase production of the said agricultural products, but that this support was in excess of China's WTO commitments. At the outset, the Panel found that the support measures for Chinese corn producers had expired, and that there were no factors weighing in favor of making findings on this expired measure. So, no findings were made with respect to this claim.

Suggested Citation

  • Sohlberg, Marcus & Yvon, Ariane, 2019. "China – Domestic Support for Agricultural Producers (China–Agricultural Producers), DS511," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 531-532, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:wotrrv:v:18:y:2019:i:03:p:531-532_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474745619000302/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:wotrrv:v:18:y:2019:i:03:p:531-532_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/wtr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.