IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/utilit/v27y2015i03p303-325_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Autonomy and Settling: Rehabilitating the Relationship between Autonomy and Paternalism

Author

Listed:
  • TERLAZZO, ROSA

Abstract

In this article I show the shortcomings of autonomy-based justifications for exemptions from paternalism and appeal to the value of settling to defend an alternative well-being-based justification. My well-being-based justification, unlike autonomy-based justifications, can (1) explain why adults but not children are exempt from paternalism; (2) show which kinds of paternalism are justified for children; (3) explain the value of the capacity of autonomy; (4) offer a plausible relationship between autonomy and exemption from paternalism; and (5) give political philosophers a justification for exempting persons from paternalism even if broad scepticism about the capacity for autonomy is justified.

Suggested Citation

  • Terlazzo, Rosa, 2015. "Autonomy and Settling: Rehabilitating the Relationship between Autonomy and Paternalism," Utilitas, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 303-325, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:utilit:v:27:y:2015:i:03:p:303-325_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0953820815000060/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:utilit:v:27:y:2015:i:03:p:303-325_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/uti .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.