IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/utilit/v11y1999i03p277-295_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Killing, Letting Die and Preventing People From Being Saved

Author

Listed:
  • Hanser, Matthew

Abstract

The distinction between killing and letting die is too simple. A third category – preventing people from being saved – must also be recognized. Like killing, preventing a person from being saved is a species of doing harm; like killing, it infringes one of the victim's negative rights. Yet preventing a person from being saved is morally on a par with letting die, which infringes one of the victim's positive rights. It follows that we cannot explain the moral inequivalence of killing and letting die by saying, as so many have, that negative rights are more stringent than positive rights. A more promising strategy is suggested at the end of the article.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanser, Matthew, 1999. "Killing, Letting Die and Preventing People From Being Saved," Utilitas, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 277-295, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:utilit:v:11:y:1999:i:03:p:277-295_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S095382080000251X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christian Barry & Gerhard Øverland, 2012. "The Feasible Alternatives Thesis," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 11(1), pages 97-119, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:utilit:v:11:y:1999:i:03:p:277-295_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/uti .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.