IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/reveco/v15y1997i02p295-317_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Una tardía defensa de la reforma tributaria de 1785: las «Cartas económicas» de RaMón María Cañedo

Author

Listed:
  • Castellano, Fernando López

Abstract

During the first years of XIX century, there were many outstanding authors who defended die direct tax system which fitted better widi die new liberal Constitution. This posistion was even further reinforced in die «Cádiz Cortes». Nevertheless, some others important authors denied die possibility of setting up die new system in order to replace die old one. The later position began with Vicente Alcalá Galiano, continued with the debates in die Cortes de Cádiz and, later on, with die works of Duaso, Pinilla and Plana to critizise die Decreto (Bill) of September, 13, 1813 on the New Public Taxes and it finished with several works by Cañedo in die second decade of die century. Ramón M.a Cañedo will defend a tax system based on indirect taxes. He will based his arguments on Adam Smidi in order to fit his tax principles to die system which was set up in 1785. From his point of view, the indirect tax system was better adapted to the economic and social conditions in Spain.

Suggested Citation

  • Castellano, Fernando López, 1997. "Una tardía defensa de la reforma tributaria de 1785: las «Cartas económicas» de RaMón María Cañedo," Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 295-317, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:reveco:v:15:y:1997:i:02:p:295-317_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0212610900006522/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:reveco:v:15:y:1997:i:02:p:295-317_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/rhe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.