IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v12y2024i3p652-665_14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bureaucratic autonomy and the policymaking capacity of United States agencies, 1998–2021

Author

Listed:
  • Bednar, Nicholas Ryan

Abstract

Despite a renewed interest in the health of the US administrative state, the absence of meaningful time-series measures of bureaucratic capacity hinders the testing of core theories of bureaucratic and executive politics. Using over 190 million personnel records, I estimate 5590 yearly policymaking-capacity scores for 261 unique agencies from 1998 to 2021. These measures provide an invaluable tool as either an independent or dependent variable in studies of administrative policymaking. To illustrate the value of these measures, I test longstanding theories about the relationship between bureaucratic autonomy and capacity. In contrast with emerging survey research, this study demonstrates that agencies with higher levels of structural independence have higher levels of policymaking capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Bednar, Nicholas Ryan, 2024. "Bureaucratic autonomy and the policymaking capacity of United States agencies, 1998–2021," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 652-665, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:652-665_14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847023000274/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:652-665_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.