IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v12y2024i1p76-93_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is compulsory voting a solution to low and declining turnout? Cross-national evidence since 1945

Author

Listed:
  • Kostelka, Filip
  • Singh, Shane P.
  • Blais, André

Abstract

Despite the substantial body of research on compulsory voting's (CV) relationship with turnout, much remains unknown about the role of different types of CV rules, their enforcement, and their ability to prevent the secular turnout decline observed around the world. Moreover, existing studies that leverage changes to CV laws are limited to a single country. We assemble rich new data on voter turnout and electoral legislation that, we believe, include the most accurate and extensive cross-national measure of CV to date. We test three theoretically derived hypotheses: that CV enforcement matters for participation; that enforcement's effect is conditioned by state capacity; and that, only when CV is enforced, will it mitigate voter turnout's post-1970 tendency to decline. We find support for each. We also find that the nature of sanctions for non-voting is irrelevant for participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kostelka, Filip & Singh, Shane P. & Blais, André, 2024. "Is compulsory voting a solution to low and declining turnout? Cross-national evidence since 1945," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 76-93, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:76-93_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847022000577/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:76-93_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.