IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v12y2024i1p220-228_15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the relative influence of party unity on vote choice: evidence from a conjoint experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Lehrer, Roni
  • Stöckle, Pirmin
  • Juhl, Sebastian

Abstract

Observational studies and anecdotal evidence suggest that party unity improves a party's electoral performance. Yet, due to a lack of experimental evidence, the causal standing of these findings remains unclear. Moreover, party unity manifests in various ways and we do not know how much different types of party unity affect the vote. Relying on a conjoint experiment implemented in a probability-based survey of the German population, our study unveils the distinct causal effect of different forms of party unity on vote choice. We further establish that appearing united can compensate for substantive policy distances between parties and voters. These findings have important implications for our understanding of how citizens vote and how intra-party politics affects the political representation of citizens in democracies.

Suggested Citation

  • Lehrer, Roni & Stöckle, Pirmin & Juhl, Sebastian, 2024. "Assessing the relative influence of party unity on vote choice: evidence from a conjoint experiment," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 220-228, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:220-228_15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847022000450/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:220-228_15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.