IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v12y2024i1p146-165_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do gains in political representation sweeten tax reform in China? It depends on who you ask

Author

Listed:
  • Kao, Jay C.
  • Lü, Xiaobo
  • Queralt, Didac

Abstract

Governments can grant political concessions to induce quasi-voluntary compliance with taxation, yet empirical evidence probing the taxation–representation connection remains inconclusive. We contend that this association remains valid but it is primarily confined to business elites in nondemocratic regimes because the same wealth that exposes them to state predation also incentivizes them to endorse tax policies that offer greater political representation. We test our argument by evaluating preferences for hypothetical tax reforms in separate samples of business elites and ordinary citizens in China. We find that business elites show stronger preference than nonelites for tax policies that include advances in political representation. We explore various mechanisms for our results and find support for government credibility, tax ownership, and tax salience considerations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kao, Jay C. & Lü, Xiaobo & Queralt, Didac, 2024. "Do gains in political representation sweeten tax reform in China? It depends on who you ask," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 146-165, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:146-165_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847022000589/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:146-165_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.