IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v11y2023i2p429-436_16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Affective partisan polarization and moral dilemmas during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Stoetzer, Lukas F.
  • Munzert, Simon
  • Lowe, Will
  • Çalı, Başak
  • Gohdes, Anita R.
  • Helbling, Marc
  • Maxwell, Rahsaan
  • Traunmüller, Richard

Abstract

Recent scholarship on affective polarization documents partisan animosity in people's everyday lives. But does partisan dislike go so far as to deny fundamental rights? We study this question through a moral dilemma that gained notoriety during the COVID-19 pandemic: triage decisions on the allocation of intensive medical care. Using a conjoint experiment in five countries we analyze the influence of patients’ partisanship next to commonly discussed factors determining access to intensive medical care. We find that while participants’ choices are consistent with a utilitarian heuristic, revealed partisanship influences decisions across most countries. Supporters of left or right political camps are more likely to withhold support from partisan opponents. Our findings offer comparative evidence on affective polarization in non-political contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Stoetzer, Lukas F. & Munzert, Simon & Lowe, Will & Çalı, Başak & Gohdes, Anita R. & Helbling, Marc & Maxwell, Rahsaan & Traunmüller, Richard, 2023. "Affective partisan polarization and moral dilemmas during the COVID-19 pandemic," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 429-436, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:429-436_16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847022000139/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:429-436_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.