IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v11y2023i2p419-428_15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do constituents know (or care) about the lawmaking effectiveness of their representatives?

Author

Listed:
  • Butler, Daniel M.
  • Hughes, Adam G.
  • Volden, Craig
  • Wiseman, Alan E.

Abstract

Substantial evidence exists that members of the US Congress vary in their lawmaking effectiveness. Less known, however, is whether constituents are sufficiently informed and inclined to hold their representatives accountable, based on their effectiveness. We conduct two separate survey experiments, informing some constituents about lawmakers' effectiveness and comparing their responses to those with the baseline level of information. We find that voters demonstrate little knowledge of their elected officials' lawmaking effectiveness. When presented with objective and credible information about lawmaking effectiveness, however, respondents express greater approval of more effective lawmakers. Effects are strongest among ideological moderates, but are even pronounced among partisans, who approve of effective representatives of the opposing party, and disapprove of ineffective representatives from their own party.

Suggested Citation

  • Butler, Daniel M. & Hughes, Adam G. & Volden, Craig & Wiseman, Alan E., 2023. "Do constituents know (or care) about the lawmaking effectiveness of their representatives?," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 419-428, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:419-428_15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847021000662/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:419-428_15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.