IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v11y2023i1p207-213_16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Am I obliged to vote? A regression discontinuity analysis of compulsory voting with ill-informed voters

Author

Listed:
  • Turgeon, Mathieu
  • Blais, André

Abstract

We study the impact of compulsory voting in Brazil, where voting is mandatory from age 18 to 70 and voluntary for those aged 16, 17 and 70+. Using a survey sample of 8008 respondents, we document voter confusion about how the age criterion applies. Some people falsely believe that what matters is one's age in an election year rather than on Election Day. Next, we perform a regression discontinuity (RD) analysis of compulsory voting among young voters with register-based data from six Brazilian elections (2008–2018). We find that the effect of compulsory voting is seriously underestimated if we focus solely on the discontinuities prescribed by the law. Our findings carry important implications for studies adopting the RD design where knowledge of the cutoff is expected of the units of interest (like those about compulsory voting) and confirm that compulsory voting is a strong institutional arrangement that promotes greater electoral participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Turgeon, Mathieu & Blais, André, 2023. "Am I obliged to vote? A regression discontinuity analysis of compulsory voting with ill-informed voters," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 207-213, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:207-213_16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847021000182/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:207-213_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.