IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v32y2024i1p101-114_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Closeness in Proportional Representation Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Luechinger, Simon
  • Schelker, Mark
  • Schmid, Lukas

Abstract

We provide closed-form solutions for measuring electoral closeness of candidates in proportional representation (PR) systems. In contrast to plurality systems, closeness in PR systems cannot be directly inferred from votes. Our measure captures electoral closeness for both open- and closed-list systems and for both main families of seat allocation mechanisms. This unified measure quantifies the vote surplus (shortfall) for elected (nonelected) candidates. It can serve as an assignment variable in regression discontinuity designs or as a measure of electoral competitiveness. For illustration, we estimate the incumbency advantage for the parliaments in Switzerland, Honduras, and Norway.

Suggested Citation

  • Luechinger, Simon & Schelker, Mark & Schmid, Lukas, 2024. "Measuring Closeness in Proportional Representation Systems," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 101-114, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:32:y:2024:i:1:p:101-114_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1047198723000220/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:32:y:2024:i:1:p:101-114_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.