IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v31y2023i4p575-590_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acquiescence Bias Inflates Estimates of Conspiratorial Beliefs and Political Misperceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Hill, Seth J.
  • Roberts, Margaret E.

Abstract

Scholars, pundits, and politicians use opinion surveys to study citizen beliefs about political facts, such as the current unemployment rate, and more conspiratorial beliefs, such as whether Barack Obama was born abroad. Many studies, however, ignore acquiescence-response bias, the tendency for survey respondents to endorse any assertion made in a survey question regardless of content. With new surveys fielding questions asked in recent scholarship, we show that acquiescence bias inflates estimated incidence of conspiratorial beliefs and political misperceptions in the United States and China by up to 50%. Acquiescence bias is disproportionately prevalent among more ideological respondents, inflating correlations between political ideology such as conservatism and endorsement of conspiracies or misperception of facts. We propose and demonstrate two methods to correct for acquiescence bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Hill, Seth J. & Roberts, Margaret E., 2023. "Acquiescence Bias Inflates Estimates of Conspiratorial Beliefs and Political Misperceptions," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(4), pages 575-590, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:31:y:2023:i:4:p:575-590_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1047198722000286/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:31:y:2023:i:4:p:575-590_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.