IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v31y2023i3p305-324_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing Partisan Symmetry: Problems and Paradoxes

Author

Listed:
  • DeFord, Daryl
  • Dhamankar, Natasha
  • Duchin, Moon
  • Gupta, Varun
  • McPike, Mackenzie
  • Schoenbach, Gabe
  • Sim, Ki Wan

Abstract

We consider the measures of partisan symmetry proposed for practical use in the political science literature, as clarified and developed in Katz, King, and Rosenblatt (2020, American Political Science Review 114, 164–178). Elementary mathematical manipulation shows the symmetry metrics to have surprising properties that call their meaningfulness into question. To accompany the general analysis, we study measures of partisan symmetry with respect to recent voting patterns in Utah, Texas, and North Carolina, flagging problems in each case. Taken together, these observations should raise major concerns about the available techniques for quantitative scores of partisan symmetry—including the mean–median score, the partisan bias score, and the more general “partisan symmetry standard”—with the decennial redistricting underway.

Suggested Citation

  • DeFord, Daryl & Dhamankar, Natasha & Duchin, Moon & Gupta, Varun & McPike, Mackenzie & Schoenbach, Gabe & Sim, Ki Wan, 2023. "Implementing Partisan Symmetry: Problems and Paradoxes," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(3), pages 305-324, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:31:y:2023:i:3:p:305-324_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1047198721000498/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:31:y:2023:i:3:p:305-324_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.