IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v27y2019i03p360-369_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Regression-with-Residuals Method for Estimating Controlled Direct Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Xiang
  • Wodtke, Geoffrey T.

Abstract

Political scientists are increasingly interested in causal mediation, and to this end, recent studies focus on estimating a quantity called the controlled direct effect (CDE). The CDE measures the strength of the causal relationship between a treatment and outcome when a mediator is fixed at a given value. To estimate the CDE, Joffe and Greene (2009) and Vansteelandt (2009) developed the method of sequential g-estimation, which was introduced to political science by Acharya, Blackwell, and Sen (2016). In this letter, we propose an alternative method called “regression-with-residuals” (RWR) for estimating the CDE. In special cases, we show that these two methods are algebraically equivalent. Yet, unlike sequential g-estimation, RWR can easily accommodate several types of effect moderation, including cases in which the effect of the mediator on the outcome is moderated by a posttreatment confounder. Although common in the social sciences, this type of effect moderation is typically assumed away in applications of sequential g-estimation, which may lead to bias if effect moderation is in fact present. We illustrate RWR by estimating the CDE of negative media framing on public support for immigration, controlling for respondent anxiety.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Xiang & Wodtke, Geoffrey T., 2019. "A Regression-with-Residuals Method for Estimating Controlled Direct Effects," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 360-369, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:27:y:2019:i:03:p:360-369_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1047198718000530/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ian Lundberg, 2024. "The Gap-Closing Estimand: A Causal Approach to Study Interventions That Close Disparities Across Social Categories," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 53(2), pages 507-570, May.
    2. Geoffrey T. Wodtke & Zahide Alaca & Xiang Zhou, 2020. "Regression‐with‐residuals estimation of marginal effects: a method of adjusting for treatment‐induced confounders that may also be effect modifiers," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(1), pages 311-332, January.
    3. Michael Grätz, 2022. "When less conditioning provides better estimates: overcontrol and endogenous selection biases in research on intergenerational mobility," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3769-3793, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:27:y:2019:i:03:p:360-369_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.