IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v25y2017i03p381-401_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unifying the Study of Asymmetric Hypotheses

Author

Listed:
  • Rosenberg, Andrew S.
  • Knuppe, Austin J.
  • Braumoeller, Bear F.

Abstract

This article presents a conceptual clarification of asymmetric hypotheses and a discussion of methodologies available to test them. Despite the existence of a litany of theories that posit asymmetric hypotheses, most empirical studies fail to capture their core insight: boundaries separating zones of data from areas that lack data are substantively interesting. We discuss existing set-theoretic and large-N approaches to the study of asymmetric hypotheses, introduce new ones from the literatures on stochastic frontier and data envelopment analysis, evaluate their relative merits, and give three examples of how asymmetric hypotheses can be studied with this suite of tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosenberg, Andrew S. & Knuppe, Austin J. & Braumoeller, Bear F., 2017. "Unifying the Study of Asymmetric Hypotheses," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 381-401, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:25:y:2017:i:03:p:381-401_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S104719871700016X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Twyla Blackmond Larnell & Davia Cox Downey, 2019. "Tax Increment Financing in Chicago: The Perplexing Relationship Between Blight, Race, and Property Values," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 33(4), pages 316-330, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:25:y:2017:i:03:p:381-401_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.