IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v21y2013i01p70-85_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Discrete Distributions: Survey Validation and Survey Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Gawande, Kishore
  • Reinhardt, Gina Yannitell
  • Silva, Carol L.
  • Bearfield, Domonic

Abstract

Field survey experiments often measure amorphous concepts in discretely ordered categories, with postsurvey analytics that fail to account for the discrete attributes of the data. This article demonstrates the use of discrete distribution tests, specifically the chi-square test and the discrete Kolmogorov—Smirnov (KS) test, as simple devices for comparing and analyzing ordered responses typically found in surveys. In Monte Carlo simulations, we find the discrete KS test to have more power than the chi-square test when distributions are right or left skewed, regardless of the sample size or the number of alternatives. The discrete KS test has at least as much power as the chi-square, and sometimes more so, when distributions are bi-modal or approximately uniform and samples are small. After deriving rules of usage for the two tests, we implement them in two cases typical of survey analysis. Using our own data collected after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, we employ our rules to both validate and assess treatment effects in a natural experimental setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Gawande, Kishore & Reinhardt, Gina Yannitell & Silva, Carol L. & Bearfield, Domonic, 2013. "Comparing Discrete Distributions: Survey Validation and Survey Experiments," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 70-85, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:21:y:2013:i:01:p:70-85_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1047198700013280/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nasir Andisha & Oscar Chiquito-Saban & Eduardo Emmerich & Aurelia Figueroa & Yuewen Jiang & Jun Hui Lee & Darren Manning & Alejandra Ortega-Sanchez & Kishore Gawande, 2014. "Reducing child labour in Panama: an impact evaluation," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 128-146, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:21:y:2013:i:01:p:70-85_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.