IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v15y2007i02p182-195_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Random Coefficient Models for Time-Series—Cross-Section Data: Monte Carlo Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Beck, Nathaniel
  • Katz, Jonathan N.

Abstract

This article considers random coefficient models (RCMs) for time-series—cross-section data. These models allow for unit to unit variation in the model parameters. The heart of the article compares the finite sample properties of the fully pooled estimator, the unit by unit (unpooled) estimator, and the (maximum likelihood) RCM estimator. The maximum likelihood estimator RCM performs well, even where the data were generated so that the RCM would be problematic. In an appendix, we show that the most common feasible generalized least squares estimator of the RCM models is always inferior to the maximum likelihood estimator, and in smaller samples dramatically so.

Suggested Citation

  • Beck, Nathaniel & Katz, Jonathan N., 2007. "Random Coefficient Models for Time-Series—Cross-Section Data: Monte Carlo Experiments," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 182-195, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:15:y:2007:i:02:p:182-195_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1047198700006458/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erik Bengtsson, 2014. "Do unions redistribute income from capital to labour? Union density and wage shares since 1960," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 389-408, September.
    2. Tibor András Marton & Anna Kis & Anna Zubor-Nemes & Anikó Kern & Nándor Fodor, 2020. "Human Impact Promotes Sustainable Corn Production in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Fawaz Fadi & Moghadam Mashaallah Rahnama, 2013. "Spatial Dependence of Technology Spillovers among Trading Partners," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 47-62, January.
    4. Anne Marie Knott, 2016. "Outsourced R&D and GDP Growth," Working Papers 16-19, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    5. Parker, Karen F. & Stansfield, Richard & McCall, Patricia L., 2016. "Temporal changes in racial violence, 1980 to 2006: A latent trajectory approach," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-11.
    6. Lance Y. Hunter & Joseph W. Robbins & Martha H. Ginn & Aaron Hutton, 2019. "Meet in the Middle: Terrorism and Centrist Party Vote Shares in Legislative Elections," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(1), pages 60-74, February.
    7. Chaieb, Ines & Mazzotta, Stefano, 2013. "Unconditional and conditional exchange rate exposure," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 781-808.
    8. Wilfredo Toledo, 2020. "Self-Employment: Entrepreneurship Or Refuge From Unemployment? El Empleo Autonomo: ¿Emprendedurismo O Refugio Del Desempleo?," Revista Internacional Administracion & Finanzas, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13.
    9. Joshua K. Ault & Andrew Spicer, 2014. "The institutional context of poverty: State fragility as a predictor of cross-national variation in commercial microfinance lending," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(12), pages 1818-1838, December.
    10. Andrew Bell & Malcolm Fairbrother & Kelvyn Jones, 2019. "Fixed and random effects models: making an informed choice," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 1051-1074, March.
    11. Alexandra Gheondea-Eladi, 2016. "The Evolution of Certainty in a Small Decision-Making Group by Consensus," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 127-155, January.
    12. Wilfredo Toledo, 2016. "Los determinantes de las exportaciones, la inversión extranjera directa y las remesas en ocho economías Latinoamericanas," Economic Analysis Working Papers (2002-2010). Atlantic Review of Economics (2011-2016), Colexio de Economistas de A Coruña, Spain and Fundación Una Galicia Moderna, vol. 1, pages 1-1, June.
    13. Krishna Chaitanya Vadlamannati, 2012. "Impact of Political Risk on FDI Revisited—An Aggregate Firm-Level Analysis," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 111-139, January.
    14. Uta Brehm & Henriette Engelhardt, 2015. "On the age-specific correlation between fertility and female employment," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(23), pages 691-722.
    15. Tsai, Tsung-Han, 2016. "A Bayesian Approach to Dynamic Panel Models with Endogenous Rarely Changing Variables," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 595-620, September.
    16. Abonazel, Mohamed R., 2016. "Generalized Random Coefficient Estimators of Panel Data Models: Asymptotic and Small Sample Properties," MPRA Paper 72586, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Shuddhasattwa Rafiq & Ruhul Salim, 2014. "Does oil price volatility matter for Asian emerging economies?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 417-441.
    18. Mill, Wladislaw & Morgan, John, 2022. "Competition between friends and foes," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    19. Boris Branisa & Adriana Cardozo, 2009. "Revisiting the Regional Growth Convergence Debate in Colombia Using Income Indicators," Ibero America Institute for Econ. Research (IAI) Discussion Papers 194, Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research, revised 21 Aug 2009.
    20. Josip Glaurdić & Vuk Vuković, 2017. "Granting votes: exposing the political bias of intergovernmental grants using the within-between specification for panel data," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 223-241, April.
    21. Brown, Richard S., 2016. "Lobbying, political connectedness and financial performance in the air transportation industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 61-69.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:15:y:2007:i:02:p:182-195_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.