IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/nierev/v265y2023ip144-156_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Plundering The Liberal Philosophical Tradition’? The Use Or Abuse Of Adam Smith In Parliament, 1919–2023

Author

Listed:
  • Greene, Zachary
  • Jasinski, Jan M.
  • Roy, Graeme
  • Schober, Thomas
  • Scotto, Thomas J.

Abstract

The contemporary relevance of Adam Smith is evidenced by continued reference to his name. Computational analysis identifies over 700 mentions of Smith and his two famous works—The Theory of Moral Sentiments and The Wealth of Nations—in post-World War 1 House of Commons debates. We find some parliamentarians appreciate Smith’s complex ideas, but most references are ‘ornamental’. Charting Smith’s use over the decades, this paper builds on Kirk Willis’ idea that studying parliamentary debates are an ideal way to understand how, at best, policy ideas, germinate and disseminate over time, or, at worst, how ‘complex ideas became slogans’.

Suggested Citation

  • Greene, Zachary & Jasinski, Jan M. & Roy, Graeme & Schober, Thomas & Scotto, Thomas J., 2023. "‘Plundering The Liberal Philosophical Tradition’? The Use Or Abuse Of Adam Smith In Parliament, 1919–2023," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 265, pages 144-156, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:nierev:v:265:y:2023:i::p:144-156_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0027950123000236/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:nierev:v:265:y:2023:i::p:144-156_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/niesruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.