IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/nierev/v263y2023ip76-93_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Happiness And Age—Resolving The Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Blanchflower, David G.
  • Graham, Carol
  • Piper, Alan

Abstract

This article is a response to a piece in this journal, by David Bartram, which questions the validity of a vast literature establishing consistently a U-shaped relationship between age and happiness. There are 618 published studies that find U-shapes in that relationship in 145 countries, and only a handful that do not. Of the 30 countries that Bartram (2023, National Institute Economic Review, 1–15) examines, he finds U-shapes in 18. We show compelling evidence of U-shapes in the remaining dozen countries. Supporting evidence of a U-shape is found in objective measures including deaths of despair, depression, stress and pain that are worst in midlife.

Suggested Citation

  • Blanchflower, David G. & Graham, Carol & Piper, Alan, 2023. "Happiness And Age—Resolving The Debate," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 263, pages 76-93, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:nierev:v:263:y:2023:i::p:76-93_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0027950123000017/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:nierev:v:263:y:2023:i::p:76-93_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/niesruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.