IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/nierev/v161y1997ip53-68_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Did English Schools and Pupils Really Perform in the 1995 International Comparisons in Mathematics ?

Author

Listed:
  • Prais, S.J.

Abstract

The recently published results of mathematics tests set to representative samples of pupils in over forty countries provide an important opportunity to re-assess priorities for reforms in English schooling. Five Western European countries—Austria, Belgium, France, Netherlands, Switzerland—are suggested in this critical study as providing appropriate standards for England's immediate aims. Attainments there are shown to be about a year ahead of England for average pupils at age 14; the gap is larger for those of below-average attainment, suggesting some structural bias in English schooling. The gap is particularly evident in those arithmetical fundamentals which need to be mastered by all school-leavers (rather than in advanced aspects suitable only for mathematical specialists); and that gap has its clear origins at the primary level of schooling.

Suggested Citation

  • Prais, S.J., 1997. "How Did English Schools and Pupils Really Perform in the 1995 International Comparisons in Mathematics ?," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 161, pages 53-68, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:nierev:v:161:y:1997:i::p:53-68_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0027950100017099/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:nierev:v:161:y:1997:i::p:53-68_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/niesruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.