IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/netsci/v11y2023i2p295-323_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling complex interactions in a disrupted environment: Relational events in the WTC response

Author

Listed:
  • Renshaw, Scott Leo
  • Livas, Selena M.
  • Petrescu-Prahova, Miruna G.
  • Butts, Carter T.

Abstract

When subjected to a sudden, unanticipated threat, human groups characteristically self-organize to identify the threat, determine potential responses, and act to reduce its impact. Central to this process is the challenge of coordinating information sharing and response activity within a disrupted environment. In this paper, we consider coordination in the context of responses to the 2001 World Trade Center (WTC) disaster. Using records of communications among 17 organizational units, we examine the mechanisms driving communication dynamics, with an emphasis on the emergence of coordinating roles. We employ relational event models (REMs) to identify the mechanisms shaping communications in each unit, finding a consistent pattern of behavior across units with very different characteristics. Using a simulation-based “knock-out” study, we also probe the importance of different mechanisms for hub formation. Our results suggest that, while preferential attachment and pre-disaster role structure generally contribute to the emergence of hub structure, temporally local conversational norms play a much larger role in the WTC case. We discuss broader implications for the role of microdynamics in driving macroscopic outcomes, and for the emergence of coordination in other settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Renshaw, Scott Leo & Livas, Selena M. & Petrescu-Prahova, Miruna G. & Butts, Carter T., 2023. "Modeling complex interactions in a disrupted environment: Relational events in the WTC response," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 295-323, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:295-323_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2050124223000048/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:295-323_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/nws .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.