IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/netsci/v11y2023i2p267-294_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How fast do we forget our past social interactions? Understanding memory retention with parametric decays in relational event models

Author

Listed:
  • Arena, Giuseppe
  • Mulder, Joris
  • Leenders, Roger Th. A.J.

Abstract

In relational event networks, endogenous statistics are used to summarize the past activity between actors. Typically, it is assumed that past events have equal weight on the social interaction rate in the (near) future regardless of the time that has transpired since observing them. Generally, it is unrealistic to assume that recently past events affect the current event rate to an equal degree as long-past events. Alternatively one may consider using a prespecified decay function with a prespecified rate of decay. A problem then is that the chosen decay function could be misspecified yielding biased results and incorrect conclusions. In this paper, we introduce three parametric weight decay functions (exponential, linear, and one-step) that can be embedded in a relational event model. A statistical method is presented to decide which memory decay function and memory parameter best fit the observed sequence of events. We present simulation studies that show the presence of bias in the estimates of effects of the statistics whenever the decay, as well as the memory parameter, are not properly estimated, and the ability to test different memory models against each other using the Bayes factor. Finally, we apply the methodology to two empirical case studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Arena, Giuseppe & Mulder, Joris & Leenders, Roger Th. A.J., 2023. "How fast do we forget our past social interactions? Understanding memory retention with parametric decays in relational event models," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 267-294, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:267-294_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S205012422300005X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:267-294_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/nws .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.