IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v20y2024i4p622-648_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hierarchical Inconsistency Among Family-Member Top Leaders and Nonfamily Executives' Compensation Levels: Evidence from Chinese Family Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Yidi
  • Deng, Zhangxuan

Abstract

In this study, we propose hierarchical inconsistency among family-member top leaders as a novel structural reason for nonfamily executives' high compensation in family firms. Hierarchical inconsistency among family-member top leaders is observed when the head in the formal business hierarchy is not ranked the highest among family-member executives and directors in the informal family hierarchy. We argue that this structure triggers contestations between the heads of the two hierarchies, adding complexity and challenges to nonfamily executives' jobs. Family firms with hierarchical inconsistency among family-member top leaders need to offer higher compensation to make up for the demanding features of these professional managers' work. The positive relationship between hierarchical inconsistency and nonfamily executives' compensation is weaker when the proportion of female family-member executives and directors is high and when the formal head's tenure is long. We use data from publicly listed family firms in China to test our arguments. Our study contributes to family business research by suggesting how the interplay between family relationships and formal organizational structures influences job features and compensation decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Yidi & Deng, Zhangxuan, 2024. "Hierarchical Inconsistency Among Family-Member Top Leaders and Nonfamily Executives' Compensation Levels: Evidence from Chinese Family Firms," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 622-648, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:20:y:2024:i:4:p:622-648_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877624000202/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:20:y:2024:i:4:p:622-648_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.