IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/macdyn/v28y2024i4p813-825_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negative income tax and universal basic income in the eyes of Aiyagari

Author

Listed:
  • Chang, Yongsung
  • Han, Jong-Suk
  • Kim, Sun-Bin

Abstract

We compare two welfare programs: the universal basic income (UBI) and negative income tax (NIT). Under a linear income tax system, we show that (i) the NIT can replicate the allocation of the UBI exactly by providing an identical marginal effective tax schedule, and (ii) the budget of the NIT is always smaller than that of the UBI. According to our quantitative model, which is calibrated to approximate the income and wealth distributions in the United States, the optimal UBI is to pay everyone 7.2% of the average income. We also show that the NIT can achieve a similar average welfare with a much smaller budget (2.3% of the GDP) by providing a subsidy that is generous to the very poor and quickly phases out as income increases.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang, Yongsung & Han, Jong-Suk & Kim, Sun-Bin, 2024. "Negative income tax and universal basic income in the eyes of Aiyagari," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(4), pages 813-825, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:macdyn:v:28:y:2024:i:4:p:813-825_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1365100523000263/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:macdyn:v:28:y:2024:i:4:p:813-825_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mdy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.