IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jwecon/v19y2024i2p113-132_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sounds too feminine? Blind tastings, phonetic gender scores, and the impact on professional critics

Author

Listed:
  • Kaimann, Daniel
  • Spiess Bru, Clarissa Laura Maria

Abstract

We shed light on assessing product quality in blind tastings and their potential (gender) biases. We study how phonetic traits of grape varieties suggest product attributes in the context of professional reviews. This study aims to close this research gap and analyze how product variety and phonetic name traits affect expert ratings. We obtained data on 18,609 wines and their ratings from Wine Enthusiast Magazine between 1997 and 2016, yielding a sample of 31,058 observations. We suppose that the gender of the taster needs to be considered to understand what affects tastings and ratings, as women and men might be attracted differently to masculine or feminine names. This study shows that masculine names receive higher evaluations than feminine ones. This phonetic gender gap is driven by lower ratings for white wines by female reviewers and lower ratings for red wines by male reviewers. In addition, white wines are rated lower overall by both men and women.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaimann, Daniel & Spiess Bru, Clarissa Laura Maria, 2024. "Sounds too feminine? Blind tastings, phonetic gender scores, and the impact on professional critics," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 113-132, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jwecon:v:19:y:2024:i:2:p:113-132_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1931436124000087/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jwecon:v:19:y:2024:i:2:p:113-132_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jwe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.