IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jwecon/v17y2022i2p141-158_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does quality pay off? “Superstar” wines and the uncertain price premium across quality grades

Author

Listed:
  • Castriota, Stefano
  • Corsi, Stefano
  • Frumento, Paolo
  • Ruggeri, Giordano

Abstract

We use data from Wine Spectator on 266,301 bottles from 12 countries sold in the United States to investigate the link between the score awarded by the guide and the price charged. The link between quality and price is positive, in line with the literature. In a deeper inspection, however, hedonic regressions show that the price premium attached to higher quality is significant only for “superstar” wines with more than 90 points (on a 50–100 scale), while prices of wines between 50 and 90 points are not statistically different from each other. Furthermore, an analysis performed through normal heteroskedastic and quantile regression models shows that the dispersion of quality-adjusted prices is described by an asymmetric U-shaped function of the score; that is, products with the lowest and highest quality have the highest residual standard deviation. Pursuing excellence is a risky strategy; the average price is significantly higher only for wines that achieve top scores, and the price premium becomes more volatile.

Suggested Citation

  • Castriota, Stefano & Corsi, Stefano & Frumento, Paolo & Ruggeri, Giordano, 2022. "Does quality pay off? “Superstar” wines and the uncertain price premium across quality grades," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 141-158, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jwecon:v:17:y:2022:i:2:p:141-158_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1931436122000219/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jwecon:v:17:y:2022:i:2:p:141-158_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jwe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.