IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/judgdm/v20y2025ip-_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When and why does observability increase honesty? The role of gossip and reputational concern

Author

Listed:
  • Nieper, Annika S.
  • Beersma, Bianca
  • Dijkstra, Maria T. M.
  • Van Kleef, Gerben A.

Abstract

People frequently engage in dishonest behavior, which entails costs to society. A common advice to increase honesty is to enhance observability. However, previous research produced conflicting findings, making it unclear when and why observability increases honesty. Here we show that observability enhances honesty when observers can gossip to relevant others (i.e., to future interaction partners who can influence the gossip target’s outcome), because it increases reputational concern. In 2 incentivized and pre-registered studies, participants privately rolled a die 30 times and were informed that reporting higher numbers would lead to higher outcomes (total N = 1608; 28650 observations). We manipulated observability and gossip. Both studies revealed that gossip to relevant others decreased dishonest reporting, whereas mere observation did not. Importantly, reputational concern partly mediated the impact of gossip on dishonesty. Moreover, gossip influenced recipients’ trust in gossip targets, with messages denoting dishonesty swaying trust more than messages denoting honesty. Our findings demonstrate when and why observability promotes honesty.

Suggested Citation

  • Nieper, Annika S. & Beersma, Bianca & Dijkstra, Maria T. M. & Van Kleef, Gerben A., 2025. "When and why does observability increase honesty? The role of gossip and reputational concern," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20, pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm:v:20:y:2025:i::p:-_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S193029752400010X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm:v:20:y:2025:i::p:-_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jdm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.