IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jpenef/v9y2010i01p43-74_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer confusion: the choice of pension fund manager in Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • CALDERÓN-COLÍN, ROBERTO
  • DOMÍNGUEZ, ENRIQUE E.
  • SCHWARTZ, MOISÉS J.

Abstract

The article shows that in markets with “noise”, such as the pension fund manager industry in Mexico, an ample number of competitors may not significantly reduce mark-ups. Utilizing the statistical distribution of the industry's “noise”, the theoretical framework allows for the estimation of the mark-up. The model also indicates that as the number of pension fund managers increases, the mark-up diminishes at a very slow rate. This implies that more participants in the industry will hardly affect prices. The referred hypotheses are confirmed using information of Mexico's pension fund industry. Evidence also indicates that account transfers among pension fund administrators barely respond to price or return considerations, and that switching has not served as a market disciplining tool that would result in lower fees and higher returns for the consumer.

Suggested Citation

  • Calderón-Colín, Roberto & Domínguez, Enrique E. & Schwartz, Moisés J., 2010. "Consumer confusion: the choice of pension fund manager in Mexico," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 43-74, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:9:y:2010:i:01:p:43-74_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474747209004004/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:9:y:2010:i:01:p:43-74_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pef .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.