IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jpenef/v23y2024i1p132-151_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three little words? The impact of social security terminology on knowledge and claiming intentions

Author

Listed:
  • Perez-Arce, Francisco
  • Rabinovich, Lila
  • Yoong, Joanne
  • Alattar, Laith

Abstract

We study the impact of changing the existing terminology to describe the rules governing Social Security retirement benefits. We provided respondents from a nationally representative online panel with information pertinent to the decision of when to claim Social Security retirement benefits. The content of the information treatments was identical for all respondents, but some were randomly given an alternative set of terms to refer to the key claiming ages (the experimental treatment group), while others were given the current terms (the control group). Despite the minimal nature of the change, there were significant differences in outcomes. Those in the treatment group spent less time reading the information, but their understanding of the Social Security program improved more than the control group. In addition, the treatment delayed retirement claiming intentions by an average of about two and a half months and increased the recommended claiming age to vignette characters by a similar magnitude. The effects were particularly strong for those with low levels of financial literacy. The relative gains in knowledge persisted several months after the treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Perez-Arce, Francisco & Rabinovich, Lila & Yoong, Joanne & Alattar, Laith, 2024. "Three little words? The impact of social security terminology on knowledge and claiming intentions," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 132-151, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:23:y:2024:i:1:p:132-151_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474747222000269/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:23:y:2024:i:1:p:132-151_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pef .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.