IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jpenef/v19y2020i4p459-490_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial health and the valuation of corporate pension plans

Author

Listed:
  • Cai, Jun
  • Luo, Miao
  • Marcus, Alan J.

Abstract

We return to the long-standing question ‘Who owns the assets in a defined benefit pension plan?’ Unlike earlier studies, we condition the market's assessment of implicit property rights on the sponsoring firm's financial health. Valuations of financially strong firms, and those that are strengthening, are more responsive to pension plan funding. For these firms, each extra dollar of net plan assets is valued at between $0.50 and $1.00. In contrast, for weak and weakening firms, valuation effects are statistically indistinguishable from zero. This result is consistent with the higher likelihood that they will renege on their pension obligations.

Suggested Citation

  • Cai, Jun & Luo, Miao & Marcus, Alan J., 2020. "Financial health and the valuation of corporate pension plans," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(4), pages 459-490, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:19:y:2020:i:4:p:459-490_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474747219000210/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:19:y:2020:i:4:p:459-490_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pef .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.