IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jpenef/v13y2014i04p347-366_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial literacy and financial sophistication in the older population

Author

Listed:
  • LUSARDI, ANNAMARIA
  • MITCHELL, OLIVIA S.
  • CURTO, VILSA

Abstract

Using a special-purpose module implemented in the Health and Retirement Study, we evaluate financial sophistication in the American population over the age of 50. We combine several financial literacy questions into an overall index to highlight which questions best capture financial sophistication and examine the sensitivity of financial literacy responses to framing effects. Results show that many older respondents are not financially sophisticated: they fail to grasp essential aspects of risk diversification, asset valuation, portfolio choice, and investment fees. Subgroups with notable deficits include women, the least educated, non-Whites, and those age 75+. In view of the fact that retirees increasingly must take on responsibility for their own retirement security, such meager levels of knowledge have potentially serious and negative implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Lusardi, Annamaria & Mitchell, Olivia S. & Curto, Vilsa, 2014. "Financial literacy and financial sophistication in the older population," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 347-366, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:13:y:2014:i:04:p:347-366_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474747214000031/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:13:y:2014:i:04:p:347-366_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pef .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.