IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v44y2024i2p411-435_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bureaucratic entrepreneurship: how frontline bureaucrats promote policy innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Xuefan
  • He, Yanling

Abstract

In contrast to other studies on policy entrepreneurship that address frontline officials’ roles in formal legislative procedures, this case study focuses on how frontline officials promote policy innovation within inconspicuous administrative routines. Because frontline officials have no legislative power, they must overcome officialism by using bureaucratic skills and seeking consensus among multiple stakeholders. “Citizen agents” and “state agents” are both necessary roles. This case provides administrative details on how a deadlocked policy was gradually enlivened within undramatic administrative routines. The findings bridge the legislative–administrative gap and improve the understanding of the long-term effects of frontline administrative activities on policy innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Xuefan & He, Yanling, 2024. "Bureaucratic entrepreneurship: how frontline bureaucrats promote policy innovation," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(2), pages 411-435, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:44:y:2024:i:2:p:411-435_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X24000023/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:44:y:2024:i:2:p:411-435_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.