IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v44y2024i2p327-343_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political trust and climate policy choice: evidence from a conjoint experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Devine, Daniel
  • Stoker, Gerry
  • Jennings, Will

Abstract

Why do citizens support or reject climate change mitigation policies? This is not an easy choice: citizens need to support the government in making these decisions, accept potentially radical behavior change, and have altruism across borders and for future generations. A substantial literature argues that political trust facilitates citizen support for these complex policy decisions by mitigating the cost and uncertainty that policies impose on individuals and buttressing support for government intervention. We test whether this is the case with a pre-registered conjoint experiment fielded in Germany in which we vary fundamental aspects of policy design that are related to the cost, uncertainty, and implementation of climate change policies. Contrary to strong theoretical expectations and previous work, we find no difference between those with low and high trust on their support for different policy attributes, assuaging the concern that low and declining trust inhibits climate policymaking.

Suggested Citation

  • Devine, Daniel & Stoker, Gerry & Jennings, Will, 2024. "Political trust and climate policy choice: evidence from a conjoint experiment," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(2), pages 327-343, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:44:y:2024:i:2:p:327-343_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X23000430/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:44:y:2024:i:2:p:327-343_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.