IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v44y2024i1p185-207_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sociopolitical reputation and the reform of pharmacies in Greece and Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Ladi, Stella
  • Moury, Catherine
  • Stolfi, Francesco

Abstract

This article argues that differences in sociopolitical reputation can explain why interest groups fail or succeed in influencing policymakers and that therefore sociopolitical reputation is a useful addition to the conceptual toolbox of interest groups scholars. Focusing on pharmacies and their associations in Greece and Portugal between 2005 and 2021, this article uses the concept of sociopolitical reputation to explain why reform attempts to reduce pharmaceutical spending and increase competition in the pharmacy sector were successful in Portugal but not in Greece, even though pharmacists are a much stronger interest group in Portugal than in Greece and even though both countries were under significant exogenous pressure to introduce structural reforms in the wake of the Eurozone crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Ladi, Stella & Moury, Catherine & Stolfi, Francesco, 2024. "Sociopolitical reputation and the reform of pharmacies in Greece and Portugal," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(1), pages 185-207, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:44:y:2024:i:1:p:185-207_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X23000363/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:44:y:2024:i:1:p:185-207_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.