IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v41y2021i4p818-834_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Race–gender bias in white Americans’ preferences for gun availability

Author

Listed:
  • Hayes, Matthew
  • Fortunato, David
  • Hibbing, Matthew V.

Abstract

We argue that Americans’ policy attitudes on firearm availability are influenced by the identity of the prospective owner. We use an experiment to demonstrate that attitudes towards gun control/availability are influenced by both race and gender; whether subjects are primed to think of African-Americans versus whites or men versus women has a substantial impact on the degree to which they support firearm access. We find that for many white Americans, Black men and white women stand on opposite poles – priming white Americans with the thought of a Black man decreases support for gun availability, whereas priming the thought of a white woman increases support for gun availability. Further, the magnitude of this effect is quite large – comparable to the difference between Democrats and Republicans. These findings underscore the importance of thinking about the complicated role identity groups play in understanding Americans’ preferences for government (in)action, even in policy areas with explicit Constitutional mandates.

Suggested Citation

  • Hayes, Matthew & Fortunato, David & Hibbing, Matthew V., 2021. "Race–gender bias in white Americans’ preferences for gun availability," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(4), pages 818-834, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:41:y:2021:i:4:p:818-834_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X20000288/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:41:y:2021:i:4:p:818-834_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.