IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v40y2020i3p513-533_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy feedback in the local context: analysing fairness perceptions of public childcare fees in a German town

Author

Listed:
  • Busemeyer, Marius R.
  • Goerres, Achim

Abstract

This article studies local processes of policy feedback by analysing citizens’ fairness perceptions of public childcare fees in a German town. Employing an experimental vignette study, we uncover complex feedback effects: first, citizens in the study regard a fee level as fair that is close to the actual fee level in the city, suggesting self-reinforcing feedback effects. Second, citizens strongly support a fee structure in which fees vary according to parental income. As this preferred fee structure differs from the local fee structure in the town itself, we interpret the citizens’ preference as evidence for self-undermining policy feedback. Finally, the actual characteristics of the respondents matter less than the fictitious characteristics of the parents in the vignettes, which points to the importance of interpretive rather than resource-based feedback effects. In concluding, we highlight the relevance of these findings for broader debates about policy feedback.

Suggested Citation

  • Busemeyer, Marius R. & Goerres, Achim, 2020. "Policy feedback in the local context: analysing fairness perceptions of public childcare fees in a German town," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(3), pages 513-533, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:40:y:2020:i:3:p:513-533_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X18000491/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:40:y:2020:i:3:p:513-533_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.