IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v18y2022i2p283-296_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptation, adjudication, and private ordering: Contractual Relations through the Williamson Lens

Author

Listed:
  • Masten, Scott E.

Abstract

Williamson's legacy will be permanently, and deservedly, linked with the theory of the firm. As important, however, is his contribution to our understanding of contracting. My aim here is to describe Williamson's conception of contracting, how it differs from other approaches to contracting, and some implications of that approach for contract design and enforcement. I argue that Williamson's ‘process orientation’ – in which the main dimension along which contracts vary is the extent to which contract adjustments are effected through court ordering versus private ordering – provides alternative interpretations of some conventional contract terms but also sheds light on some otherwise puzzling contractual phenomena.

Suggested Citation

  • Masten, Scott E., 2022. "Adaptation, adjudication, and private ordering: Contractual Relations through the Williamson Lens," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 283-296, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:18:y:2022:i:2:p:283-296_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137421000722/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:18:y:2022:i:2:p:283-296_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.