IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v12y2016i02p471-497_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do ‘institutional complementarities’ foster female labour force participation?1

Author

Listed:
  • THÉVENON, OLIVIER

Abstract

We analyse how female labour force participation responds to policies supporting the work-life balance, and do so using country-level data for 18 OECD countries from 1980 to 2007. Included is an original analysis of ‘complementarities’ between different policy measures, as well as of potential variations in their influence across different family policy regimes. The results highlight that expanded childcare service coverage affects women's labour market participation, which is greater in countries where support for working mothers is higher overall. But the influence of each single policy measure varies across regimes. Interactions between policy measures and the context in which they are implemented are important factors to consider since they can, for instance, either foster the positive impact of one measure or lessen the adverse effect of another.

Suggested Citation

  • Thévenon, Olivier, 2016. "Do ‘institutional complementarities’ foster female labour force participation?1," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 471-497, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:12:y:2016:i:02:p:471-497_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137415000399/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lisa Cameron & Diana Contreras Suarez & Yi-Ping Tseng, 2023. "Women’s transitions in the labour market as a result of childbearing: the challenges of formal sector employment in Indonesia," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2023n06, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:12:y:2016:i:02:p:471-497_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.