IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v47y2025i1p1-10_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

2024 Hes Presidential Address: Was Hume A Mercantilist? For Smith, Yes: The Friendly Disagreement Of Adam Smith And David Hume On Money

Author

Listed:
  • Paganelli, Maria Pia

Abstract

David Hume and Adam Smith were friends, but their friendship does not imply that the two authors shared the same ideas, or should have shared the same ideas. Money is an example of a subject of disagreement between David Hume and Adam Smith that has either been ignored or interpreted as a puzzle, given their friendship. I suggest that Smith did not replicate or cite Hume’s exposition of the quantity of money in his Wealth of Nations because Smith thought Hume was wrong. For Smith, Hume fell into the mercantilist fallacy of considering the accumulation of money as wealth. Rather than accumulating money through market restrictions, as other mercantilists would, Hume advocated the accumulation of money through commerce and hoarding, but Hume’s goal was still the accumulation of gold and silver. Smith saw through Hume’s mistakes and addressed each of them, thus rejecting Hume’s theory of money, while maintaining their friendship.

Suggested Citation

  • Paganelli, Maria Pia, 2025. "2024 Hes Presidential Address: Was Hume A Mercantilist? For Smith, Yes: The Friendly Disagreement Of Adam Smith And David Hume On Money," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(1), pages 1-10, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:47:y:2025:i:1:p:1-10_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1053837224000518/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:47:y:2025:i:1:p:1-10_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.